Search results

@Dr. Kush , you seem to have a rather short temper. No matter how frustrating the situation was, it is eminently clear that counter-breaking rules is never acceptable under any circumstances. Now when you are banned, it is apparently everyone else being in the wrong or being "corrupt" - that's...

The ban was two months. We've reduced it for 48 hours from now. If any staff member knows anything about this or wants to provide further information, that's the deadline you have if you want to influence the ban.

@ChosenDemon provided me with some further information that hadn't been given in this appeal. Ontop of the Ltap re-offence, he has also disrespected staff in sits considerably and showed a poor attitude. With that addition, this appeal will be closed again.

I want to re-open this. Just going over a few appeals and it doesn't seem like his "re-offence" was intentional. I understand that there's a 0-tolerance attitude towards someone on "probation", but I think this one was quite doubtful as the reason for pushing him up to a 4 weeks ban. I don't see...

Don't use that avatar again.

Counter-breaking rules is not acceptable, but we'll see if the ban length is warranted. You need to do what Spartan asked you to do though.

dmorrison2k is no longer here. @Lola Meid

@JustJosh

One of the victims of some recent issue I think. @DevulTj @Coderall

Disobeying staff directions alone is quite unacceptable.

Unlocked, I want to ask a question. @RJC If I understand it correctly you simply went ahead and did something after you had been told by staff not to? Do you admit to this?

Well, the probation was for another kind of behaviour. I don't think it was meant to extend to this? Ban seems fully justified, a month however is quite long for this type of rule-breach. PS: If the ban stays, you should spend the month taking a writing course to make your appeals better.

Yeah, exactly. I'm sorry if you end up being dissatisfied with Premium for any reason, but changing your mind once you've used it is is not covered by our refund policy.

@BeepUnit How do you explain it?

Alright so, I noticed WhiteBlood's initial post which requests someone else to review this. I guess since I got this far, I'll do it. I know you had an automatic weapon on you, so rule General #4 doesn't apply. However, like I said - you're definitely on the line, so going forward you should be...

Yeah, I'm speaking generally since you quoted me wrongly. As for your case specifically I would probably not have banned you if I was the admin - although you're definitely on the line for where it becomes breaching FearRP. If he had positioned himself a bit better around you and aimed for you...

I said - if - the car was already moving slowly so it could accelerate off the scene very quickly. If it had stopped, and someone was aiming right at you, who would try to drive off? 2 weeks is very long though. FearRP is often something easy to breach in the heat of the moment, so I think the...

@Clint and @PerishedSins off their trials.

Denied.