Your Steam Name: Legendary Feral Ghoul |moat.gg
Your Steam ID: STEAM_0:0:64170573
Your Character Name: Adam james
Ban Length: 1 day and 12 hours
Banning Staff Member (@AdminName to mention the staff member): @Gamz
Ban Reason:+Left Farming
Time of Occurrence:8:55
Relevant Evidence: So in the monolithrp rules it states "The usage of any kind of anti-AFK script or remote control software is not tolerated. Using some form of AI to perform farming, mining, etc. is not allowed. The only exception we allow is the usage of the +attack command as long as you're immediately able to respond to ingame actions. This does not include +right or +left. If you do not respond to a staff members attempts to get your attention, you are liable for breaching this rule. " the issue is, that I responded when gamz grabbed me because i was not afk so according to this rule i did not breach it, because i responded. Also I think for the first offence of this issue this seems kind of severe for a punishment. In my previous appeal the bolded section was not considered because according to the rule if u clearly respond to the admin then you are not liable for breaching of the rule.
Additional members involved/witnessing:
Your Steam ID: STEAM_0:0:64170573
Your Character Name: Adam james
Ban Length: 1 day and 12 hours
Banning Staff Member (@AdminName to mention the staff member): @Gamz
Ban Reason:+Left Farming
Time of Occurrence:8:55
Relevant Evidence: So in the monolithrp rules it states "The usage of any kind of anti-AFK script or remote control software is not tolerated. Using some form of AI to perform farming, mining, etc. is not allowed. The only exception we allow is the usage of the +attack command as long as you're immediately able to respond to ingame actions. This does not include +right or +left. If you do not respond to a staff members attempts to get your attention, you are liable for breaching this rule. " the issue is, that I responded when gamz grabbed me because i was not afk so according to this rule i did not breach it, because i responded. Also I think for the first offence of this issue this seems kind of severe for a punishment. In my previous appeal the bolded section was not considered because according to the rule if u clearly respond to the admin then you are not liable for breaching of the rule.
Additional members involved/witnessing:
