✪ BullyHunter

Banned
Banned
Member
Joined:
Sep 2, 2017
Messages:
428
Points:
52

7

Years of Mono

LV
0
 
Your Steam Name: BullyHunter
Your Steam ID: STEAM_0:1:60438167
Your Character Name (If Applicable): Henry Lopez

Admin being reported( Tag by writing @ before their forum name) @Stuvi

Reason for Report: Incompitence
Time of Occurrence: n/a
Evidence to support your claim:

Reason number 1, starting with the most recent - Refusing to review a cheating report due to a missing steam id:
Here, Stuvi denies a report against a hacker (the biggest problem in monolith) just because of a missing SteamID. He was given a timestamp, a video and a character name. There is absolutely no excuse for not being able to trace what their steam id is. Not too long ago the person reported was banned for exposing himself using ESP (Wall hacks) just as the report described.

Another case of this can be found here, https://monolithservers.com/forums/threads/cheating-aimbot.24828/#post-149351. Stuvi was given a very specific time stamp and also provided with a video. In the video the person reported can be seen headshotting ( which is surprising because for some reason you guys set the spread to be ridiculously high ) him with his first shot immediately after teleporting, something that cheats are capable of, and it certainly wasn't lag as there was no delay between any action what so ever.


Stuvi denies this report after given a video of a person (mass) rdming while obviously hacking ( no spread combined with no recoil ) . He was provided with a video, and a timestamp.


Reason number 2, refusing to review a valid report even with a given ( but not listed in the format ) steamid:
This one shows 2 people literally mass rdming within the bank while no staff are online. Stuvi did not review the situation at all before deciding it wasn't possible to get their steamid. You were given an exact time stamp. Their steam id's are even in the video
1611155634736.png
Looks like STEAM_0:0:624640707

and

1611155731717.png
Looks like STEAM_0:505585298.

Regardless, you should have been able to get their information even if the victim did not look directly at them



Reason number 3, punishing me for submitting evidence against a hacker and hypocrisy:
1611155839985.png
The evidence I had submitted was valid and is in general ridiculous that you'd punish someone for even attempting to submit evidence against a hacker let alone valid evidence.


Stuvi wasn't directly involved in this discussion nor did it contribute in any way whatsoever.
1611156111128.png



Additional members involved/witnessing:
Read, understood and followed staff report rules?: Yes
 
Last edited:

✪ BullyHunter

Banned
Banned
Member
Joined:
Sep 2, 2017
Messages:
428
Points:
52

7

Years of Mono

LV
0
 
One of the primary outcomes i hope for is someone else being in charge of cheating reports, someone who knows what a cheater looks like and does.
 

DevulTj

Monolith Expert
Member
Joined:
Dec 3, 2016
Messages:
1,559
Points:
147

7

Years of Mono

LV
0
 
Denied as OP is permanently banned.
 
Top