Search results

Closed due to the OP being disregarded.

Seems pretty valid. I'll refer to @Perry, @Johnny183 and @Bryan1504 to step this forward and approve your refund.

Rule 1.8 states: If you understood the rule set, you would understand that this is strictly forbidden. Even past this, how could you ever think that exploiting is fine? The logic is completely backwards and it does not look great for you.

I've deleted unnecessary comments.

Just saying guys, really try to stay out of an appeal that isn't relevant to you. Vouching for him in this case actually doesn't really help & just makes it look forced. I'll review this shortly with the Community Management.

Denied.

Denied. I think the time is warranted, and you should take the time to learn your mistakes.

You already made an appeal. It was denied. Take your ban length. Denied.

Adjusted Rule 2.3

You said you didn't care that the sit was still happening, so I banned you for trying to escape the sit. You simply tried to jump off the roof to the Police garage in a place which would be trespassing. Denied.

Are you serious? You're saying that you didn't call him fat yet you did in the report. This report is simply ludicrous. Denied.

@Cookie has resigned from her position.

Denied. It's evident that Thy has done literally nothing here.

Added rule 5.9

The situation here is inconclusive, though personally I think that Bodean handled the sit a bit sloppily. It should be improved but it's not warranting a Staff report. Denied.

Edit your post so it doesn't look like it was created by someone under the age of 10. Until then we will not be reviewing it.

Seems good. Locked.

The state of this report is inconclusive, and there is a lack of evidence to actually show that the person you are reporting did anything wrong. You are in a Radio Channel with the people that this guy raided, so you were in the right to be killed anyway, since you were chasing them. Denied.

Yes, it does.