Search results

We'll unban you now. Make sure to live up to @Kocayine 's terms.

@Kay Swisha You're nothing but lucky the ban isn't longer. You flamed a staff member - doesn't matter where you do it, if we find out it'll have consequences in our community. This is denied and concluded - accept this decision or your ban will be longer. Denied.

A valid ban for flaming. Removing the car was a fully appropriate and authorised action. Denied.

Rule change 2017.09.27

Rule change - 2017.09.26

I'm going to deny it this time. There's an important point to be made in this denial of your appeal. When you continually argue with us in a public Discord channel after we've made a decision, and we tell you firmly to stop, and you continue - it's not a request but a demand. You show zero...

Denied.

I've found something really bad on your record and want to talk to you in private. You are re-banned till then. @JeremiahbOi

@Dr. Kush , you seem to have a rather short temper. No matter how frustrating the situation was, it is eminently clear that counter-breaking rules is never acceptable under any circumstances. Now when you are banned, it is apparently everyone else being in the wrong or being "corrupt" - that's...

The ban was two months. We've reduced it for 48 hours from now. If any staff member knows anything about this or wants to provide further information, that's the deadline you have if you want to influence the ban.

@ChosenDemon provided me with some further information that hadn't been given in this appeal. Ontop of the Ltap re-offence, he has also disrespected staff in sits considerably and showed a poor attitude. With that addition, this appeal will be closed again.

I want to re-open this. Just going over a few appeals and it doesn't seem like his "re-offence" was intentional. I understand that there's a 0-tolerance attitude towards someone on "probation", but I think this one was quite doubtful as the reason for pushing him up to a 4 weeks ban. I don't see...