Search results

Under Review.

After reviewing the provided evidence, I did find the accused player to have broken the following rules: Fail Driving - Driving around, intentionally smashing into objects and other cars for no reason As a result, this player will receive one warning point for Fail Driving. Player Report...

After reviewing the provided evidence, I did find the accussed player to have broken the following rules: Fail RP - Actions done are not realistic at all and harmful to other players Job Abuse - This was done while he was on cop, which should not happen for any reason As a result, this player...

@M I M I C As this report is against you, you have twenty four hours to respond, or else I will continue without your input.

@Vettige Ludo As this report is against you, you have twenty four hours to respond, or else I will continue without your input.

Under Review.

Under Review.

@Ethann In logs, it does show you getting car pinched and when you were down a player came, grabbed your stuff, and did not return it. The player is in the process of being dealt with and what I can see from logs, I approve the refund of your G36C, 6 Small medkits, and a Kevlar with No Helmet.

After further review, I found the player to have broken the following rule: RDM - Shot you for no reason As a result the offending player will receive one warning point. Player Report Status: Accepted / Locked / Moved

Under Review.

After reviewing the given evidence, I found the accussed player to have broken the following rules: False Tazing - Used his tazer for no reason Prop Climbing - Used a couch in an unrealistic way to access the house you were in Fail RP - Actions done by him, including breaking into the house...

Under Review.

After reviewing the provided evidence and witness testimonies, I have come to a decision. Also keep in mind I was in game and witnessed in chat what was going down, and can without a doubt found the accussed player to have broken the following rules: FailRP - Actions done in RP were not very...

Under Review.

After reviewing the provided evidence, I agree, yes this situation could have been avoided and was entirely done to get a reaction and to have an excuse to vdm. I found the accussed player to have broken the following rules: Player Baiting - Intentionally doing this to get a reaction FailRP -...

Under Review.

Under Review.

After further review of the provided evidence, I could not determine if Mr.toilet had dc'ed in that sit, but he did break the following rules: Prop Kill - He intended to kill the person with the factory set, in an unrealistic way. RDM - He also killed him for no reason. For these rulebreaks...

Locked for further review.

The two people that were raiding took them but I had them remove the items they gained from their inventory, so they no longer have the above items in their possession, due to the people that were raided not being available when said item removal took place.