Your Steam Name: Twitch RealComplex34
Your Steam ID: STEAM_0:1:96914517
Your Character Name (If Applicable): Bradly Lester
Admin being reported: (Tag by writing @ before their forum name) @wr1ght @friskiemar
I and some friends were robbing the bank, we got a hostage and started negations with the Captain of the PD. We stated that two of us would leave the bank while one of us stayed with the hostage, then we could have a free passage without being followed once we collected the money from all the vaults. Donut Time and I left the bank and @wr1ght decided to go against the Captain's orders and took a shot because apparently, he had a “clear shot” of the hostage taker inside the vault. However the hostage told me he had video evidence of the event and he never moved, meaning if he had a “clear shot” on the hostage taker, then the shot was compromised. The shot should’ve never been taken as the life of the hostage then became out of our control. @wr1ght still decided to shoot the hostage then proceeded to blame it on the fact the hostage moved, but when you see the video you can clearly see the hostage never moved. So in our view, this is complete bull and we should be given the money that was in the bags as if the SWAT did value life. We would’ve got to the drop off point 100% as we had the hostage held-up in the bank and nothing should have happened to us.
PS: another violation of F.T.V.L is when the Captain of the PD was shot by a random member of SWAT possibly @wr1ght as it was a sniper shot that hit him.
After the event, we made a report and @friskiemar claimed it, from the very beginning it felt like he was on @wr1ght side for not letting us show our video evidence until he brought the Captain and he vouched for us and said that he demanded “the swat to leave” but they never did. this is an example of F.T.V.L. then proceeded to say the situation was a big misunderstanding which in my opinion isn’t, due to the evidence I'm going to show you. In our Opinion This situation was voided to save the moderator from any punishment.
Time of Occurrence: 19:22 BST 14:22 EST
Evidence to support your claim:
(full video)
(hostage getting shot)
(Captain getting shot)
Additional members involved/witnessing: @Chocolate Milky @g0hst @Spuppi
Your Steam ID: STEAM_0:1:96914517
Your Character Name (If Applicable): Bradly Lester
Admin being reported: (Tag by writing @ before their forum name) @wr1ght @friskiemar
I and some friends were robbing the bank, we got a hostage and started negations with the Captain of the PD. We stated that two of us would leave the bank while one of us stayed with the hostage, then we could have a free passage without being followed once we collected the money from all the vaults. Donut Time and I left the bank and @wr1ght decided to go against the Captain's orders and took a shot because apparently, he had a “clear shot” of the hostage taker inside the vault. However the hostage told me he had video evidence of the event and he never moved, meaning if he had a “clear shot” on the hostage taker, then the shot was compromised. The shot should’ve never been taken as the life of the hostage then became out of our control. @wr1ght still decided to shoot the hostage then proceeded to blame it on the fact the hostage moved, but when you see the video you can clearly see the hostage never moved. So in our view, this is complete bull and we should be given the money that was in the bags as if the SWAT did value life. We would’ve got to the drop off point 100% as we had the hostage held-up in the bank and nothing should have happened to us.
PS: another violation of F.T.V.L is when the Captain of the PD was shot by a random member of SWAT possibly @wr1ght as it was a sniper shot that hit him.
After the event, we made a report and @friskiemar claimed it, from the very beginning it felt like he was on @wr1ght side for not letting us show our video evidence until he brought the Captain and he vouched for us and said that he demanded “the swat to leave” but they never did. this is an example of F.T.V.L. then proceeded to say the situation was a big misunderstanding which in my opinion isn’t, due to the evidence I'm going to show you. In our Opinion This situation was voided to save the moderator from any punishment.
Time of Occurrence: 19:22 BST 14:22 EST
Evidence to support your claim:
Additional members involved/witnessing: @Chocolate Milky @g0hst @Spuppi